Written by Andrew Baird, MCSI

Associate Director, Strategic Partnerships

After months of unsettling build-up, speculation and discussion, the actual content of the Government’s budget in late November was surprising only in its un-surprisingness. There were changes – freezing thresholds, dividend and savings-rate increases, new NI rules, ISA restructuring, VCT relief cuts, BR portability, the pension-IHT regime – each designed to erase part of the Government’s funding gap.

As important as the substance of the changes is their timeline.

The Government has chosen to phase in many of the most significant tax measures over several years, meaning the full fiscal impact of these policies will only be felt later in the current parliamentary term. While the effectiveness of this approach will be debated politically, for advisers, it creates meaningful opportunity. We are entering a period in which clients can plan proactively and make deliberate, sequenced decisions rather than be forced to react to overnight shocks.

The risk of waiting too long

But “later” can quickly become “too late”, a pretext for inaction and a continuation of the status quo. One commonly heard refrain in the advisory community is: “people might think this is never going to happen”. That assumption is misplaced, as the Government knows credibility with the bond markets rests on a comprehensive implementation of their economic plans. Legislation will be brought forward to underline this commitment. The Budget has established a clear planning runway that advisers should be using now to help clients negotiate what lies ahead.

Here we examine the most consequential changes and how the staged implementation creates a series of complex intersections between tax liabilities and planning opportunities. Pensions remain powerful for accumulation, but they are no longer the “leave-till-last” asset for legacy planning.

A timeline of changes

The policy impact of this year's Budget, when combined with the changes of the Labour government's first Budget in 2024, creates an intricate, interlocking series of deadlines. Far from discrete entities, advisers know that moving one piece often shifts three others.  

At a high level, these are the most important changes in each of the next four years:

2026

• Dividend taxes will rise by 2%, with the basic rate increasing to 10.75% and the higher rate rising to 35.75% (the additional rate won’t change and the personal allowance remains £500). Tax relief on VCTs falls to 20% from 30%.
• A new £2.5 million allowance for unquoted business and agricultural assets comes into effect, offering exemption from IHT. Beyond this cap, relief drops to 50%, creating an effective IHT rate of 20% on the excess.
• Simultaneously, the Business Relief afforded to AIM shares will shift, with qualifying shares restricted to 50% relief, benefitting from an effective IHT rate of 20%.

2027

• A new savings-income rate and property-income surcharge will be introduced.
• The pension-IHT reforms take effect, bringing unspent pension pots into the Inheritance Tax net.

2028

• The Normal Minimum Pension Age (NMPA) rises from 55 to 57.

2029

• A cap on National Insurance relief via salary sacrifice is introduced.

Advisers need to consider planning sequences, as the order in which clients act in some cases can matter more than the rules themselves. Consider the 2027 pension reforms. The traditional logic – spending non-pension assets to preserve the pension’s IHT shield – inverts. It may now be more effective to accelerate pension withdrawals immediately to fund Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs). This removes capital from the looming IHT net and starts the seven-year clock. The old sequence risks trapping funds in a punitive double hit of 40% IHT plus beneficiary income tax.

Pensions: now an engine of growth  

The case for accumulation remains robust: growing your pension remains a cardinal rule. Tax-relieved contributions, employer top-ups, and tax-free growth remain powerful compounding engines, even if upcoming changes to salary sacrifice and National Insurance slightly dampen the efficiency for high earners.

The strategic “why” has shifted

However, the strategic "why" of pensions has shifted. The clear directive behind the new policy framework is to push clients to consume their pension wealth rather than hoard it; the Government’s own consultation paper was explicit on this, stating its aim is to remove "the incentive to use pensions as a tax-planning vehicle for wealth transfer" and ensure they are restricted to "their intended purpose of funding retirement." The era of the pension as a tax-free legacy warehouse is over: strictly speaking, a pension is now an asset for this generation, not the next.

Decumulation now requires precision, not rules of thumb

Decumulation strategies can no longer rely on universal rules of thumb. We’ve already mentioned the end of the ‘leave-till-last’ mantra. There is a renewed, strong use case for phased drawdown combined with the "normal expenditure out of income" exemption. By taking regular pension income to fund habitual, surplus-income gifts, clients can take money out of their estate tax-efficiently, aligning with the Government’s incentive to spend while still supporting heirs.

The heavy lifting in navigating this complexity will now be done by cashflow modelling. For a 50-year-old client today, this goes beyond simple growth projections; it requires digitally simulating the friction between immediate income tax and future inheritance liabilities. The fundamental question – “Where should I be drawing it from?” – now hangs entirely on the specific interplay of tax rates now and on death. Advisers can add value by solving this precise calculus in a way that aligns with the client’s circumstances.

Balance tax-efficient structures across different wrappers

By simultaneously eliminating long-standing exemptions on pensions and tightening reliefs on alternative assets, the Budget effectively forces advisers into a game of "cross-wrapper optimisation." The impact of frozen tax thresholds amplifies the value of any remaining shelters, making the ISA allowance more critical than ever. However, the Government has added a behavioural twist: the new £12,000 cap on Cash ISAs serves as a deliberate nudge, steering younger savers away from safety and toward the equity markets if they wish to utilise their full £20,000 allowance. The message is clear: tax-free status is now a privilege, reserved for those willing to support the wider economy through investment risk.

VCT cuts may strengthen AIM’s appeal

While the cut to Venture Capital Trust (VCT) relief might initially seem to dampen enthusiasm for small-cap backing, it may ironically bolster the Alternative Investment Market (AIM). With VCT relief falling and AIM shares retaining 50% Inheritance Tax relief – along with superior liquidity – capital may flow toward the junior market as the most efficient remaining route for growth assets. This rotation is supported by the stamp duty holiday for IPOs, a policy clearly designed to align investor incentives with the Mansion House ambition of revitalising UK listings.

A growing tax burden on businesses

Businesses have faced new costs, most notably the 2% hike in Employer National Insurance. The macroeconomic scars are already visible: economists have directly linked this levy to weak hiring figures and the stagnation of GDP in the third quarter. For owner-managers, the pain is personal as well as corporate. The maxim that "my business is my pension" is facing an existential threat from a tax system that is dismantling the entrepreneur's traditional exit strategy piece by piece.

A cumulative erosion of entrepreneurial value

This is a real danger of death by a thousand cuts. The erosion of Business Asset Disposal Relief with the lifetime limit compressed from £10m to just £1m – combined with sharp increases in Capital Gains Tax and the dividend tax rise, can reduce the net value of a life's work. The new £2.5m cap on Business & Agricultural Relief and changes to portability are additional challenges. Founders who once assumed their equity was completely shielded from IHT must now urgently reassess their exposure.

These shifts have also distorted the traditional salary/dividend mix, requiring a fresh calculation of how value is extracted annually. Perhaps most frustrating is the policy dissonance: while the Government repeatedly claims it wants to incentivise growth, the looming "entrepreneurial incentive review" hangs over the sector like a sword of Damocles. Advisers must help clients navigate this uncertainty, balancing the need for growth with the reality of a tax regime that is increasingly hostile to the fruits of that success.

Intergenerational planning: a more complex, more valuable conversation

No single regulation exerts a greater gravitational pull on British estates than the seven-year rule. Misjudge it, and beneficiaries face a punitive tax bill. As The Times noted in November, there is "nothing more simple and nothing more lucrative" than this mechanism, yet it remains a trap for the unprepared. The article highlighted that HMRC recovers hundreds of millions of pounds annually from ‘failed gifts’ – wealth transfers intended to be exempt but ultimately clawed back into the estate because the donor died too soon.

Trust structures remain essential in the new landscape

Crucially, the interaction between the seven-year rule and the new policy landscape renews the importance of established structures. With the pension shield removed, Loan Trusts and Discounted Gift Trusts offer a vital middle ground for clients needing to freeze estate growth or secure immediate IHT reductions without sacrificing income access. Simultaneously, despite the changes to BR from April 2026, BR remains the most effective solution for speed: the two-year qualification period offers a rapid alternative to the standard seven-year gifting clock, often proving essential for older clients.

Early engagement prevents the compressed, reactive planning that often leads to errors when new rules bite. Advisers must game-plan scenarios – specifically, what happens if a client passes away before the 2027 pension reforms fully take hold. Most importantly, intent must be evidenced. In the current climate, documentation is defence: if the strategy isn't clearly recorded, in the eyes of HMRC, it didn't happen.

What advisers should do now

The Budget gives advisers something rare: certainty on the milestones. The paralysis of speculation is over, and with it, the justification for waiting. The timeline is set. Plan now, reap the benefits later.

Advisers need to reach out to clients immediately, guiding them through a strategic checklist to secure their position before the window closes:

• Run full multi-wrapper audits
• Rebuild decumulation sequences
• Flag salary-sacrifice and dividend-tax exposure
• Map gifting and BR strategies ahead of 2027
• Move clients to four-year plans, not one-year reactions

Ultimately, the "gift of time" this Budget provides is a depreciating asset. Every month of inaction brings a client closer to the time where options narrow. The Government has provided a runway – now advisers must land the plane.

Important notice  

Opinions expressed represent the views of the author at the time of publication, are subject to change, and should not be interpreted as investment or tax advice.

This article is for investment professionals only. This article is for information only and does not form part of a direct offer or invitation to purchase, subscribe for or dispose of securities and no reliance should be placed on it. No reliance should be made on this content to inform any investment of tax planning decision.

This content contains information that is believed to be accurate at the time of publication but is subject to change without notice. The explanation of all of the tax rules set out have been written in accordance with our understanding of the law and interpretation of it at the time of publication.

Whilst care has been taken in compiling this content, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Downing as to its accuracy or completeness, including for external sources (which may have been used) which have not been verified.